Lifespan
psychology has been truly beneficial to my overall learning experience and my
future teaching career. I am really
praying for my ability to retain this learning so that I can apply it in my
classroom in the very near future. There
was a quote in this week’s reading, Theories
of Childhood that read, “Theories need to be real to the developing
teacher.” I will need to understand the
theory and the development, not the theorist who said it, with that in mind, I
thought it was important to make connections with some of these philosophies
and how they could be applied in the classroom.
John Dewey was
the founder of progressive education; he believed that education should be
child-centered. Students should be able
to guide their own learning by choosing topics that are interesting to
them. The teacher has the task of making
these topics meaningful to the educational process. Although, Dewey thought education should be
fun, he did not believe that it should be fun for fun’s sake. Dewey believed that when students are engaged
in learning, in activities that they are interested in, learning becomes
enjoyable. Many of Dewey’s principles
can be seen in the early childhood setting, but I can see how his theories are
important in any elementary setting. I
will find ways to make connections to the things that my students want to learn
about. I will be committed to integrating
their interests in a meaningful way, in a way that will encourage them to be
lifelong learners.
One of Erik
Erikson’s major challenges that he poses to teachers is considering the
individual learner. As an assistant, I
have seen many teachers unknowingly ascribe certain characteristics to student
behaviors. Students are lazy when they
don’t finish work, or are tired in class.
Students are smart when they are extremely quiet in class and passively
follow directions. Erikson teaches us
that we need to know our students, and their distinct family situations and
stages of development in order to teach effectively. A student, who doesn’t finish work, may be
having vision problems, difficulty reading text or any number of issues that
might have nothing to do with being lazy.
A student that doesn’t participate in class may be hiding a problem that
they are having with learning.
Piaget found
value in the process of student understanding and not just finding correct
answers. When I was in seventh grade I
felt extremely challenged by math. I
didn’t understand the equations and couldn’t figure out how to make algebra
work for me. No matter how often I heard
teachers and tutors say, “just plug in the numbers, it’s simple,” it never felt
that way. As I think about Piaget and
his theories I would suggest that he would have started much smaller with a me,
a girl who couldn’t correspond x, y and z to real numbers. He would say that I needed to understand the
why, of what I was trying to accomplish.
Although I may have still got the answers wrong, I would have understood
the process.
Understanding how
correlated child development is to education will help me understand my
students in a way that will not only help them in my classroom, but will also
help them with the social and emotional tools that they need in life. I look forward to applying these theories in
the classroom.